Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helpshift

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:44, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Helpshift[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing mentions, routine funding notices and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/AaronEndre with a history of what looks to be promotional editing, based on behavioural evidence. Does not meet WP:NCORP. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:48, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Interesting case because the page has been up since 5 years or so. My first reaction is always to try and help save a page if it has been there for that long. I googled it. A lot of coverage pops up in major independent publications. So might satisfy WP:SIGCOV criteria but it seems like a PR run instead of actual notability. Is not worth being on an encyclopedia in my opinion Globe2trotter (talk) 18:19, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:24, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:24, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:25, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I added a reference, and I think the references from reliable sources are enough to establish notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 18:52, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:36, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete on account of lack of notability. Five years is a long time for WP:TOOSOON but it's still too soon. -The Gnome (talk) 10:18, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.