Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hello Wood

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:34, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wood[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article, does not pass WP:NCORP. Most of the sources are not independent. 1292simon (talk) 08:59, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:18, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:18, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They seem notable to me. It is true that 6 of the 29 sources are from their websites, but the rest of them aren't (Architect's Forum http://www.epiteszforum.hu is a respected & independent source, as is index.hu, mucsarnok.hu etc.) They won several awards, and even inspired a similar project in Argentina. – Alensha ^talk 15:13, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:12, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2020-07 ✍️ create, 2020-06 ✗ G11, 2020-06 ✗ deleted, 2020-06 ✗ deleted

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.