Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HelloSign

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:21, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

HelloSign[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obvious COI article by a HelloJenna, consisting mostly of enticement over all the cool things the product can do. Meanwhile, I find scant mention of this product in independent reliable sources, so notability is not established. Even a CNN address led to content by HelloSign. Largoplazo (talk) 18:25, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:18, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not notable. Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:CORP, particularly WP:CORPDEPTH. A news search led to a number of articles that appeared to be promising until I noticed that their author, Ben Kepes, is an IDG contributor instead of a staff writer. This TechCrunch article provides some coverage of the company, but only with respect to one of its products, and not the company itself. I found no other eligible sources meeting WP:CORPDEPTH. — Newslinger talk 05:08, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete PR pieces, and other sources which show that this product doesn't meet WP:CORPDEPTH. Also maybe a case of WP:TOOSOON. JC7V-talk 23:01, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.