Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hellmouth (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hellmouth (band)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Band. ~~I can't find any sources that aren't primary. Made harder because the name has some historical significance, but for band references there are few.~~ Shadowjams (talk) 06:14, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article looks good. My original reasons for deletion are no longer relevant. Shadowjams (talk) 01:50, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 06:26, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the article doesn't assert anything that would cause the band to meet WP:MUSIC. Mm40 (talk) 12:10, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This band meets criterion 1 of WP:BAND, with non-trivial coverage in the Metro Times [1], Alternative Press [2], and Sputnikmusic [3]. Gongshow ^Talk
Weak keep some very minor press coverage, an album on a major-label subsidiary, and a member who led another notable band (Suicide Machines). Taken individually these facts would probably not be enough to save the article, but taken together I'd say this just squeaks by. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 19:04, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per the reviews in the article and [4], [5], and [6]. Joe Chill (talk) 22:48, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I just cleaned the article up a bit, it previously read like an advert. I also incorporated some of the refs mentioned by Gong Show and Joe Chill. IMO the punknews, metro times, and altpress pieces satisfy criterion 1 of WP:BAND. J04n(talk page) 05:30, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.