Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helicopter dick

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 17:25, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Helicopter dick[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Prod (and prod endorsement) removed without improvement or rationale.Delete as per WP:DICDEF and WP:NEO. In addition, zero of the sources use this actual term. Three refer to it as simply "helicoptering", while the 4th uses the term "dick helicoptering". Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:35, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per my endorsement of the original PROD, and per WP:URBANDICDEF: There is absolutely no literature or news sources using this term, and only one—MEL magazine—for "dick helicoptering" (and again, no news outlets), while [1] "helicoptering" is an accepted sociological phenomonon in parenting. This is urban-dictionary trivia backed by insufficient (read: no) reliable sources; the fact that one of the only non-blog/social media sources available is The Sun—a now deprecated source—speaks volumes. ——SerialNumber54129 13:54, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this isn't Urban Dictionary. Trivialist (talk) 17:05, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 13:11, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not a DICKtionary. Get it? valereee (talk) 13:29, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete What a dick article, WP:NOTDIC applies here I think. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 21:19, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - There are multiple sources detailing an incident that occurred WRT such an incident. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:01, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Three of the listed sources are about the same incident, making this WP:NOTNEWS. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 23:58, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not a dictionary. No chance this article develops beyond being a dictionary. Britishfinance (talk) 21:19, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTDIC TheMesquito^buzz 22:58, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - An unnotable WP:NEO that has no reliable sources that describe the term. Three of the four supposed sources in this article are all on the same, single incident, and none of them even use the term. 169.232.162.112 (talk) 18:06, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.