Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heidi Lavon
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:59, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Heidi Lavon[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Heidi Lavon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Coverage is limited to non-RS tabloids and clickbait sites, does not meet WP:GNG. signed, Rosguill talk 22:20, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Arizona. signed, Rosguill talk 22:20, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Internet. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:49, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - can't find enough in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources to pass WP:GNG.Onel5969 TT me 01:41, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. a quick search on Google returns tabloid links like [1], [2]. Doesn't pass WP:GNG JunitaWorker (talk) 19:00, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG. The person who loves reading (talk) 02:08, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG -- Devokewater 13:52, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.