Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heavens Connection

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No evidence has been presented that this is "one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene", apart from GOOGLEHITS. Randykitty (talk) 15:01, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Heavens Connection[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Less important music group fails WP:BAND. →Enock4seth ^(talk) 18:10, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:43, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ghana-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:44, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 13:44, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment can the nominator →Enock4seth please say what the reason is for proposing this deletion? Thanks Mccapra (talk) 14:26, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a means of promotion or a vanity publisher. Spam from the groups only current member. Part of a promo effort for Psalm 1, Christ Junkie aka Psalm 1, the christ junkie aka Psalm 1, the Christ Junkie aka Psalm 1 (the Christ Junkie). Article content is not supported by the sources. Claims of significance are not backed by sourcing. Sourcing is insufficient for GNG. 1,3,5 are mere name checks. 2 is PR. 4 is just a download site. Nothing satisfying wp:music. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:19, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets WP:BAND "Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene" - article needs to be rewritten in an ecyclopedic style to remove promotional language such as, "Heavens Connection is set to empower the youth of today with God's Word and light" - Epinoia (talk) 15:20, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Scott Burley (talk) 02:47, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - per Epinoia--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 20:52, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Epinoia, is there any good sources out there that verify that extrodinary claim? duffbeerforme (talk) 12:27, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Search google for Ghanaian+Gospel+rap to find out... is not a large genre, making this group more notable.--Epiphyllumlover (talk) 18:17, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Searching under those criteria doesn't bring up a single mention of this group, except on Wikipedia mirrors. Richard3120 (talk) 20:59, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:25, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:GOOGLEHITS. What good source exists that verifies that extraordinary claim, keeping in mind that Ghanaian Gospel rap is not a notable style. duffbeerforme (talk) 12:27, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:GNG and WP:BAND. Simply no reliable sources found at all, which makes it difficult to believe that they are "one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene", as Epinoia claims, if there aren't any sources talking about them at all. Richard3120 (talk) 22:57, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.