Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heather Von Stackelberg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Darkwind (talk) 23:27, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Heather Von Stackelberg[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet WP:Notability (academic). Teaches Math at Yellowhead Tribal College and holds two research posts (assistant at Grant MacEwan College/Associate at Athabasca University. Checks on Google (once facebook, wikipedia and blogs are eliminated has about 32 "relevant hits"), mainly online articles Alive.com or institutional information. Coauthor of one chapter in a collection of articles. This article itself was originally a course project. Jpacobb (talk) 00:51, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: the only sources which are about the subject (instead of about the subjects work) are tied to the institution at which the subject teaches, it seems. Fails the academic notability guideline as mentioned above. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:51, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability not found. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:02, 9 April 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:GNG. What she does in her job is par for the course. What she does in her spare time reflects her personal interests. Most teachers do all this and often more.--Zananiri (talk) 15:58, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Agreed with all of the above. There's no claim of notability nor any evidence of it. Kabirat (talk) 10:13, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
For the record, I raised a concern about this article previously at its talk page, on the grounds that not only was her notability not clear from the content, there wasn't even any real claim of notability, as opposed to mere existence, being made in the first place. I'm still not seeing the notability — it's referenced almost entirely to primary sources — and I'm still not seeing the first speck of a credible reason why she would even have been given as a topic for a "contribute to Wikipedia" course assignment. Nothing against her as a person, but WP:ACADEMIC is pretty clear that university or college professors are not automatically entitled to articles on here just because they exist. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 07:14, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. fan page. Agricola44 (talk) 17:45, 10 April 2013 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. No WP:RS to satisfy WP:AUTHOR. In fact, the level of absurdity in this article is so high that it leaves it perhaps just short of being a WP:HOAX. Qworty (talk) 06:34, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.