Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heather Vandeven

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:50, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Heather Vandeven[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP without any solid sourcing that fails GNG & ENT. Potentially worth a redirect to Life on Top.. Spartaz ^Humbug! 10:01, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:04, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:06, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:06, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:06, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 11:06, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Don't know if these are RS, but we see her being featured in 1, 2, 3, 4. ☆★Mamushir (✉✉) 14:17, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- No. Hopeless. I suggest you read the GNG again if you think these count. 1. Not RS. 2. Rewarmed prezz release, the link to the night club is the clue, 3. Isn't about her at all - just a photo. 4. Really?? Wtf?? Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:50, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable entertainer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:13, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete She's clearly a non-notable entertainer. There's no multiple in-depth reliable sources about her. It should be obvious that articles having to do with sex toys don't cut it. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:30, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Penthouse Pets, per WP:ATD. No indication of the level significant coverage necessary for independent notability. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 18:09, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.