Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heather Harmon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. lifebaka++ 13:54, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heather Harmon[edit]

Doesn't appear to pass notability. The article basically advertises an amateur pornographic site, which doesn't even update any more J-Star (talk) 16:51, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil (talk) 17:02, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Doesn't satisfy WP:PORNBIO or WP:WEB for me. KSEX Awards (nomination) is not well known. No reliable sources to support claims of notability. Morbidthoughts (talk) 18:24, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
FYI - this was nominated twice under its previous name, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ideepthroat and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ideepthroat (2nd nomination). --Golbez (talk) 18:26, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete based upon being a recreation of previously deleted article. My apologies, I misread the above. A simple delete for no notability being established, no reliable sources, free advertising etc. will do then. DreamGuy (talk) 20:21, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- There was no deletion. The previous two AfDs closed with no consensus except to move the article. • Gene93k (talk) 20:52, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no claim to notability --T-rex 00:27, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Heather is very famous on youporn ... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.135.95.93 (talk) 22:15, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which is supposed to mean, what, exactly for her being notable enough to be in an encyclopedia? DreamGuy (talk) 23:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Satisfies WP:PORNBIO, specifically "Has made unique contributions to a specific pornographic genre". This is asserted in the article - "an early pioneer in commercial, real-life couple pornography". It's even referenced. Orpheus (talk) 02:56, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does Eros Guide Las Vegas constitute a reliable source? --J-Star (talk) 23:08, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. It's an independently published online magazine - see here for their masthead. Orpheus (talk) 02:14, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I look trhough the site and all I see is advertising. It's a so called "guide", listing adult entertainment... from stripshows to massage to prostitutes. Is an advertising site a reliable source just because it is published regulary? --J-Star (talk) 06:25, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They publish reviews. Reviews aren't advertisements. Here's the index. Orpheus (talk) 02:52, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not satisfy WP:PORNBIO. Contributions to porn need more acknowledgment than a minor award and one writer's statement that Heather Harmon is a pioneer as one of the early players. • Gene93k (talk) 15:45, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Heather Harmon was a pioneer, creating one of the very first online amateur pornographic websites. This satisfies WP:PORNBIO in that she 'began a trend in pornography'. Also her website is infamous and could be considered 'iconic' and indeed 'groundbreaking'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.151.2.231 (talk) 21:59, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Heather is probably one of the most famous porn actresses today. If any porn biographies should be kept up, this one definitely should. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Final Philosopher (talk • contribs) 02:49, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Heather is an internet sensation for scummy people like me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.15.143.114 (talk) 22:53, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.