Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heathcote School, Essex

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Danbury, Essex#Education. (non-admin closure) feminist 04:48, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Heathcote School, Essex[edit]

Heathcote School, Essex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no notability for this school that teaches children from ages 2 to 11. SL93 (talk) 13:43, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 13:43, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • delete. Sounds like the sort of place that could be notable, but there is no evidence of it in the article and I could not find anything. The school was founded in 1935 according to its website so maybe someone has written about it since then.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 13:53, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:44, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Danbury, Essex, as nothing in the recent RfC affected this practice. As noted above, given the alumni claims and the fact that it has been around for a while, it could be notable, and a redirect to preserve the article's history makes sense. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:03, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Danbury, Essex#Education, a section I just created. I created this so long ago, I don't know the circumstances, but I couldn't find anytihng to confirm it meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 15:23, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • redirect. Striking my delete as I agree redirect makes more sense, as it certainly would be a {{R with possibilities}} in case someone has/finds enough to justify its existence.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 10:40, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.