Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heat aggravation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:01, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Heat aggravation[edit]
- Heat aggravation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Seems to be an WP:OR essay. While thorough, interesting, and referenced, Wikipedia is not the place for original research like this. Lankiveil (talk) 04:20, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete yes the tone is of an essay, I do not think any of this text would be very useful for an encyclopedia article. Also it feels like a copyvio. --W.marsh 04:24, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Essay with some OR/synthesis of published material, but could potentially be a valid encyclopedia topic. Maybe. I'm netural on this one.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 05:08, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The issue could be solved with a little editing. I imagine there would be sufficient research into this area to expect this article could be made more encyclopedic Rotovia (talk) 06:40, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete. While there might be a reasonable topic lurking somewhere here, I'm unsure that the current article - which presents the Ayurvedic medicinal view of the phenomenon of "heat aggravation" - is a particularly useful approach. Beyond that, there isn't a lot here beyond a collection of loosely related observations. Zetawoof(ζ) 12:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as original research by synthesis. Also, written in an unencyclopedic essay-like way; even if the topic can be sourced properly in such a way as to deserve an article, I don't think there's much worth saving here. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.