Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Head or Heart

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Guerillero | My Talk 02:43, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Head or Heart[edit]

Head or Heart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Album fails per Album notability standards -- No album artwork, no official tracklist. And no reliable sources that marks it notability of being a to be released album. Plus, Wikipedia is not a crystalball. Article should be deleted and / or redirected until more sources can be obtained or it's closer to its release date. livelikemusic my talk page! 22:07, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Title is meant to be Head or Heart not Head to Heart. livelikemusic my talk page! 23:10, 26 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Today, the official album tracklist and cover were unveiled. So I don't know if that means this should be closed, or if we continue this AfD. livelikemusic my talk page! 19:29, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Keep Seeing as how those were the reasons it was foolishly placed on the AfD list, yes. It's an album being released on Atlantic Records and the iTunes pre-order begins in three days. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sendu1984 (talkcontribs) 19:47, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Why was this even nominated for deletion? It's an upcoming release on a major label by a major artist, and the page contains multiple citations from outside sources. The tracklist and cover just got revealed today. This needs to be closed. Samjohnzon (talk) 21:59, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Seems to meet the requirements of WP:NALBUMS. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 00:12, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Quite clearly fails the WP:NALBUMS policy as it isn't released yet and Perri ain't exactly Guns 'n Roses, so it doesn't meet the "Unreleased material" exception. Gm545 (talk) 13:46, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the second part of that says "generally, an album should not have an independent article until its title, track listing and release date have all been publicly confirmed by the artist or their record label", both of which have apparently been published. It seems like a borderline case here, IMO, but what needs to be shown is that it does/doesn't meet WP:GNG. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 01:25, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 01:00, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  20:19, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.