Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hazrat Wallar Baba

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 13:08, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hazrat Wallar Baba[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Simply googling got me nothing but Wikipedia mirrors. Heck, I have had to turn Facebook upside down just to find the village in which this run-of-the-mill South Asian saint was buried. I was lucky enough that someone posted a G-Earth screenshot, saying it was Chajjar Syedna, so after some searching, lo and behold: 34°30′45″N 73°03′09″E / 34.512403°N 73.052362°E / 34.512403; 73.052362 actually has a marker in G-Maps with مزارشریف (حضرت ولاڑبابا جی) or "Mazār Sharīf (Ḥaḍrat Wallaṛ Bābā Jī)". Considering that the village is so small that Google does not even name it and that I get zero unique non-wiki-related hits, even for the Urdu-script variant, I'd say that this "saint" fails WP:GNG by a mile. --HyperGaruda (talk) 06:15, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. HyperGaruda (talk) 06:26, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. HyperGaruda (talk) 06:26, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. HyperGaruda (talk) 06:26, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Simply not notable fails WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 17:18, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG. — Insert CleverPhrase Here 09:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 15:39, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 11:12, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as yet another article about an obscure South Asian religious figure created in good faith by fans. The article bears all the hallmarks, from the lack of sources outside of Wikipedia mirrors down to quaint claims of notability based on purported local shrines/commemorations. This has become so common over the past five years or so that the phenomenon almost deserves its own Wikipedia essay. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:25, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.