Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hawduqo Mansur

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 09:02, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hawduqo Mansur[edit]

Hawduqo Mansur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unverifiable article by a blocked sock, references are all text/not cited to any verifiable source. Search for Хьаудыкъо Мансур gets us nothing, the article itself says, 'Not much is recorded about Hawduqo' and it's right. Deletion until someone creates anything verifiable/reliable is the only option, IMHO. Fails WP:GNG. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:54, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Military, and Russia. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:54, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 09:21, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as weird shit. Not a single Google books ref in Russian or Turkish. Various searches on combinations of name, dates and “Chechen” produce nothing. Our existing fairly detailed articles on the Chechen wars make no mention of him. Possibly made up or garbled, but definitely should not be in mainspace. Mccapra (talk) 09:37, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Agree, not sure what's going on with this one. Oaktree b (talk) 13:06, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Does not meet notability guidelines Proton Dental (talk) 00:45, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Would be notable if he existed, but I don't think he actually existed. It may be worth looking at this sock chains' other creations, as well. Curbon7 (talk) 12:49, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.