Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hawaii Vice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tim Song (talk) 04:34, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hawaii Vice[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fairly generic series of porn films which fail WP:NOTFILM individually and collectively, with no indication that the GNG or any other specialized guideline can be met. No assertion of notability, mostly a string of unsourced one-sentence plot summaries. Deprodded by an IP editor on the rationale that it was directed by a notable porn actor, which is not a notability standard. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 23:29, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom. Fails WP:NOTFILM and being directed by a notable person is not satisfactory for establishing notability. EuroPride (talk) 00:27, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Relax taken care of, merged all the stuff to the actress, and with some reference sources. UPCDAYZ (talk) 21:28, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Please do not interrupt in ongoing AfD by moving the article under discussion to a different title while the discussion is ongoing. The proper solution is to propose such a move/merge in this discussion. bd2412 T 02:17, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
  - I was only tryin to help. So I would like to propose the move/merge. I added some interesting trivia. Its in both. UPCDAYZ (talk) 22:29, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A merge to Kascha Papillon is the best solution, if the material is trimmed back to what is relevant to the actress and properly sourced. bd2412 T 22:26, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ℳøℕø 06:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 02:17, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Why is this convo being ignored? Trivia doesn't help it really, its still not notable. JBsupreme (talk) ✄ ✄ ✄ 20:18, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- So what about the merge? Article on the headline performer should have a list of the films anyway! 166.137.10.41 (talk) 11:59, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.