Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hasta Kosha
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. There is probably an article to be written about hand gestures in Indian classical dance, but this is not it; the subject is touched on in Mudra#Indian classical dance, but as this term is not used there, a redirect seems pointless. JohnCD (talk) 13:55, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hasta Kosha[edit]
- Hasta Kosha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Cannot find any evidence of notability. Article has been without references or evidence of notability since 2007. Colapeninsula (talk) 14:15, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or substantially rewrite. It's not often that you come across an article where the title doesn't even appear in the article itself. I tried to find the meaning of "Hasta Kosha" but didn't come up with very much. Apparently a style of dance in India, but I think the article is titled poorly... Not enough mention found to keep. Wikipelli Talk 14:59, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 12:35, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Rewrite or Delete This article has no lede, and the title seems to appear in a different form well into the article. There is significant content, but without very substantial rewriting the article is not up to minimum Wikipedia standards. --DThomsen8 (talk) 12:58, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.