Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hassan Khan (actor)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:11, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hassan Khan (actor)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actor making debut, notability not established, fails all criteria at WP:NACTOR, contested prod. WWGB (talk) 23:47, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. WWGB (talk) 00:39, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. WWGB (talk) 00:39, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Obviously non-notable person. Maybe, if the movie is published and it turns into something big which results in him having a big career, then he might be notable. Not now. Fails GNG. CerealKillerYum (talk) 01:10, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now at best as none of this suggests solid notability yet. SwisterTwister talk 01:43, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep because of the mentions in newspapers. He can become notable after release of the film. I think it should be kept and unsourced material should be removed.--Musa Talk 10:10, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Let's see what happens when the film comes out first. Clarityfiend (talk) 09:48, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's nothing that suggests notability: not close to enough based on general notability guidelines; not even close if you use WP:NACTOR. Speculating on future notability is not relevant. --Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 02:01, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete That he may appear in a film does not imply that he is notable now. He has not received significant coverage; his name is mentioned only in passing in articles about the film (if it is mentioned at all). Fails GNG. Ca2james (talk) 04:48, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.