Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harvard Bonin
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 02:36, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Harvard Bonin[edit]
- Harvard Bonin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I simply found nothing good to suggest better notability, improvement or a target for moving elsewhere and this has existed since August 2007 and has all the signs of it; the best my searches found were these links. I would've PRODded this but I wanted comments. SwisterTwister talk 20:34, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:36, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:36, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:36, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Couldn't find anything beyond mentions and an interview or two. Sam Walton (talk) 21:11, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) Run-of-the-mill spokesperson coverage in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please {{ping}} me. – czar 05:13, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:16, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.