Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harsha Iyer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 18:05, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Harsha Iyer[edit]

Harsha Iyer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD [1]. Not convinced that the coverage here is enough to meet WP:BASIC or NMUSIC. The articles by the Rolling Stones India and The Hindu do deal directly with the subject but it's written in a Q&A style that reads like paid publicity. Rolling Stones refers to his debut album as "critically acclaimed" but there's no evidence that it has charted or won any awards, and I can't find any other reviews of the album from reliable sources. KH-1 (talk) 10:11, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. KH-1 (talk) 10:11, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:12, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: No independent reliable sources to establish notability hence failing GNG. Kichu🐘 Need any help? 13:48, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per nomination. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 04:17, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as The Hindi source here also includes an album review so he seems to be marginally notable at this stage, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mojo Hand (talk) 22:42, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Aseleste (t, e | c, l) 01:46, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.