Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Hall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 01:32, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Hall[edit]

Looks like a vanity article to me. Only 21 and not found on a Google search. Necrothesp 13:53, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, author's promotional skills will serve him well, but not here.Bjones 13:56, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. The article links to Karen Fesop, which seems non-notable to me as well. Stu ^{’Bout ye!} 14:12, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The artist had himself covered in pigeon fæces in Trafalgar Square and used these as an amalgam for a lifesize sculpture shown being shat out of a 16ft perspex pigeon as a comment on America in Iraq? Is there a picture of this for purposes of verification? I can't believe that a publication such as the Daily Mail would have passed up the opportunity to use such a piece of contemporary art to comment on The Way We Live Today. (aeropagitica) 14:21, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Bucketsofg 14:49, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable and vanity, fails WP:BIO --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 20:49, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 02:05, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.