Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harrison Bagwell (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 15:01, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
Harrison Bagwell[edit]
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Harrison Bagwell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Failed Gubernatorial candidates don't automatically a WP:NPOL. This one didn't get 5,000 votes. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:58, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:58, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:58, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Like most Billy Hathorn articles, once you peel away primary sources and the articles linked via tangential relations to the subject there's no real indication of notability. Best, GPL93 (talk) 15:02, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: per WP:NPOL and WP:POLOUTCOMES. Marquardtika (talk) 19:01, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Delete More Billy Hathorn crud. Probably contains copyvios from offline sources, knowing his way of editing. 💵Money💵emoji💵💸 01:06, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly fails WP:NPOL. Newshunter12 (talk) 14:06, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.