Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harold E. Glass
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. causa sui (talk) 00:13, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Harold E. Glass[edit]
- Harold E. Glass (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Ad-bio for a non-notable business man, created by a spam-only account. damiens.rf 19:47, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:27, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 23:27, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Fails WP:Prof. Will have to find notability elsewhere. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:59, 22 July 2011 (UTC).[reply]
- Delete - Lacks coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 13:43, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Wikipedia:BIO, RESUME, and SPAM. I didn't find any notable sources on both Google and Yahoo. SwisterTwister talk 05:24, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Sentences like "This allowed him to remain at the head of cost benchmarking innovation by introducing more progressive cost benchmarking tools." make me think this is marketing spam. In any case he appears not to pass WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:33, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I wikified the article to make it more readable, but subject does not meet the requirements of WP:AUTHOR or WP:PROF. No independent sources other than subject's own website. Yoninah (talk) 13:28, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.