Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harly Wise

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 00:54, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Harly Wise[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deletion requested via OTRS by individual purporting to be article subject (identity not verified). Please consider WP:NFOOTY and WP:BBLP. No opinion by nominator. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:10, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:48, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:48, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 10:49, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Has played in against a fully professional club against another fully professional club in a competitive competition, so meets WP:NFOOTY. As for WP:BBLP, well the only vandalism is from an IP trying to blank the page, presumably they are the individual purporting to be article subject. Can't see why they would want it deleted, though I guess it would be even stranger if someone was pretending to be the subject and trying to get it removed.--Echetus Xe 10:53, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - player passes WP:NFOOTBALL having appeared in an EFL Cup match for Hartlepool, a fully professional side. No obvious reasons apparent why the deletion has been requested. Kosack (talk) 12:07, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:16, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:16, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - meets WP:NFOOTBALL; needs improving, not deleting. Giant Snowman 07:03, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Passes NFOOTY, has played senior international football, in a fully professional league or in a match in the competition proper (i.e. not qualifying rounds) of a cup competition which involved two teams both from FPLs. Fenix down (talk) 15:40, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete notability for footballers is a minumum guidelines. It does not require us to have articles on everyone who played in a fully professional game. With someone of such a low notability, privacy concerns should win the day and we should delete the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:33, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Passes WP:NFOOTBALL, no reasons given for deletion request. Re: John Pack Lambert's comment above, I might agree if the OTRS identity was verified (you are given the opportunity to verify your identity when you contact OTRS). Without a confirmed identity, the filer might be Harly Wise or it might be someone wanting to vandalize Wikipedia by nuking the Harly Wise article. --Guy Macon (talk) 02:28, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: - agree, unless the OTRS is verified. We've got enough people who do odd things for motives we don't understand. The IP who was trying to blank this article the other day geolocates to western London - so might be. But who knows. Nfitz (talk) 16:03, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.