Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hariram Suthakaran

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This discussion is being closed early per WP:SNOW. Mz7 (talk) 05:26, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hariram Suthakaran[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't think this qualifies for a speedy (not promo enough for G11, does assert significance so not A7). However, on examining sourcing on Suthakaran he does not pass GNG or NAUTHOR. Eostrix (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 13:33, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete; IMO this is a G11 (I've seen less promotional material getting speedied, this is a blatant advertisement). Java Hurricane 14:08, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Have tidied up the article, however their is nothing to suggest notability. May be a case of Wikipedia:Too soon --Devokewater@ 14:54, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this is a superly over promotional article on a 22-year-old writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:33, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails WP:AUTHOR and no reliable sources cited to corroborate its content. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 12:05, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.