Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hario

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 06:28, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hario[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This Japanese company fails WP:COMPANY. The only source in the article is a primary source. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 01:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Could not find any reliable secondary sources mentioning this company. mineffle ^(talk) 08:04, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 11:08, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 11:08, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: My searches find various routine announcements and a passing mention in a trade publication article Specialty Coffee Retailer – via HighBeam (subscription required) : enough to verify this as a company going about its business but nothing indicating encyclopaedic notability. However Japanese sources may have better: I have notified the Japan project and am happy to revise my opinion if they locate better . AllyD (talk) 11:26, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Salt given this has not only been deleted in 2008, but was also in 2014, so the fact it's here yet again only suggests blatancy at restarting it later, since it would make it the 4th attempt. Although its local billion income is significant enough to not speedy, there's still not the currently needed substance. SwisterTwister talk 05:10, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.