Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hari Kumar K

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Unnecessary to leave open any longer. WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 10:29, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hari Kumar K[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not notable Kabahaly (talk) 15:17, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep minutes after it was nominated for deletion, the creator added enough newspaper cites to indicate that he clearly meets GNG. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:43, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, even perhaps speedily given the lack of detail in the deletion rationale. The coverage already cited in the article is adequate to establish notability, and there's more out there, e.g. [1], and that's just the English language coverage. Note that he is generally credited as 'K. Hari Kumar' or 'K Hari Kumar', so the article should probably be renamed. --Michig (talk) 15:45, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep. Trying to delete articles without giving their creators a decent opportunity to finish their work is atrocious, abusive, and far too often protected by a cadre of editors which aren't really interested in building an encyclopedia. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 05:23, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per all the above.VictoriaGrayson^Talk 02:25, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.