Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hardcover Mysteries (TV series)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Considering it barely passes WP:GNG. Borderline case, but guess it will work. Withdrawing the nomination. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:38, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hardcover Mysteries (TV series)[edit]

Hardcover Mysteries (TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable show that clearly fails notability guidelines, per WP:GNG and supported by WP:TVSERIES for absence of reliable secondary sources. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:06, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:11, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:11, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: This one is very borderline. I've found one source, THR, that may contribute to notability, though only marginally. I've added a second source to the article, but it's basically a WP:PRIMARY press release which doesn't contribute to establishing notability at all. The existing NY Post source in the article does contribute to notability, as a full-fledged review. But, all in all, this probably isn't enough – if more secondary sources can't be found, this one probably doesn't quite cut it in notability terms. --IJBall (contribstalk) 18:06, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 09:51, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Enough sources to establish notability per GNG -- Whats new?(talk) 08:55, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Paint-by-numbers ID show, but just brushes the edge of GNG enough to stay as a separate article. Nate (chatter) 14:57, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.