Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harbor Pointe Credit Union

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 14:04, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Harbor Pointe Credit Union[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can find anything to show this passes WP:ORG, created by a single purpose account with undisclosed WP:COI as they appear to work in th subjects marketing dept (from name matching), with no sources after 4 years KylieTastic (talk) 13:10, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 13:26, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. ^{Engr. Smitty Werben} 13:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Insufficient notability. Kablammo (talk) 15:37, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
delete It's difficult to see how a small, local CU could be notable unless it did something jaw-droppingly wrong, and in any case there's no real claim to notability made. Mangoe (talk) 18:56, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No claims of notability in the article, nothing notable found in google news. Jeepday (talk) 00:07, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - meets neither WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:56, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.