Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HaraHara Mahadeva

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. So Why 13:10, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HaraHara Mahadeva[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is clearly lacking information. It was unsourced, no references and written poorly. Mark Jhomel (talk) 07:01, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:43, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:45, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 16:05, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - TheMagnificentist 12:17, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - WP:AFDNOTCLEANUP. "Lacking information," "unsourced," and "poorly written" aren't deletion rationales. Madg2011 (talk) 15:10, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:01, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. While I agree that "lacking information," "unsourced," and "poorly written" are not reasons for deletion, the fact I can find no indication that this series actually exists is. I found not a single reference to this show. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:20, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails the GNG. Even though WP:ATA is a lame essay, I think it should be amended to include rationales to avoid. Nothing against this particular nom, though. L3X1 (distænt write) )evidence( 14:59, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sources call it a "popular" TV serial. Has gone over 100 episodes. I added a few sources but didn't change the text. Article should be renamed to "Hara Hara Mahadeva". Maybe it could be tied to other language Wikipedia articles. There were some awards but it looked like they were from that channel. They renamed the channel just before this program started showing. Maybe someone can use the sources to improve rather than delete the article. StrayBolt (talk) 21:46, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I added more text and sources to the article: crew, budget, review. A correction, it has over 300 episodes. I've seen sources saying it is the most watched show on Star Suvarna. StrayBolt (talk) 19:10, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.