Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Happy Beds

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:45, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Beds[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is based entirely on a handful of press releases. Tone is that of a PR announcement. Guy (Help!) 13:11, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:47, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:47, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- no indications of notability and does not meet GNG. I'm only seeing trivial / PR coverage. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:45, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as entirely PR, nothing at all consisting of non-PR substance or anything otherwise notable-consisting. SwisterTwister talk 22:41, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.