Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hansi Bar Association

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:46, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hansi Bar Association[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable association. Virtually no search results. Also a possible COI with the author ChunnuBhai (talk) 01:15, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for notability. Poor search results point to non-notability and so does the article itself. Knox490 (talk) 01:31, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 01:31, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: State bar associations in the United States are inherently notable. If bar associations in states of India function along the same lines (where membership is a prerequisite to the practice of law), then this should be kept and improved. At the very least, we should have an article on how state bar associations do work in India, into which we could merge this if needed. bd2412 T 02:39, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:47, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:28, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I think User:BD2412's arguments about state bar associations may be correct, and would mean state bar associations in India may be inherently notable just as they are in the US. However, as far as I can work out, this is not actually a state bar association for the state of Haryana, it is a bar association for the city of Hansi. I think city bar associations aren't inherently notable. Some of course are, e.g. New York City Bar Association, but what is true for New York City will not be true for many smaller cities in the US. In the same way, Hansi is not a particularly major Indian city, so its bar association probably isn't notable, although the case may be made if there is sufficient coverage in reliable sources, but I don't see that coverage here. SJK (talk) 09:51, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.