Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hans Perk
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:22, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hans Perk[edit]
- Hans Perk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Creator is username blocked at the moment, possible COI. Created two pages, this one and the company this individual apparently founded. A google news search reveals nothing obvious on the first page except for a Dutch page that references " Hans Perk, program manager for sustainable cocoa and tea development." I don't think it's the same person. Best reference here is the Variety article, but I don't see it as enough in this context. Shadowjams (talk) 05:32, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The Variety article plainly doesn't pass the "non-trivial" component of the notability guidelines. No additional evidence of notability appears to exist. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 08:19, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete insufficient biographical coverage. Gigs (talk) 18:43, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to A. Film A/S. --Lambiam 22:02, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete because it sounds like advertising. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 17:30, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.