Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannah Greenwood

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. NW (Talk) 21:19, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hannah Greenwood[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:BIO and WP:ENT. hardly gets any coverage for her most "well known" role. [1]. LibStar (talk) 02:56, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:18, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete Seems to have some notability as a stage actress, and her career pushes at WP:ENT just a bit. This one might best serve the project with some decent cleanup and sourcing to meet WP:BLP and WP:GNG. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 21:21, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - Her roles seem to have a lot of coverage and she seems to have just enough to scrape by notability. I've added two and provided contextual quotes for them. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 17:01, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep One of the starring title roles of an ABC TV series and a recurring role on Neighbours? Just crosses the notability line for me. --Canley (talk) 00:46, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, agree wtih Canley.-Regancy42 (talk) 04:12, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep also agree with Canley. Vartanza (talk) 16:49, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Canley. Just having a STARRING role in a TV series is enough to pass WP:N. ArcAngel (talk) 07:19, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.