Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hannah Bacon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 21:22, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hannah Bacon[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It looks like this footballer never played in a fully professional league and has no cups for the national team, thereby failing WP:NFOOTY. I do not see correspondence to WP:GNG either. Ymblanter (talk) 20:06, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Ymblanter (talk) 20:06, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. Ymblanter (talk) 20:06, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Ymblanter (talk) 20:06, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet even our overbroad footballer notability guidelines.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:12, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep She seems to have played for the national team in a few international tournaments, not sure if that warrants an article. Oaktree b (talk) 02:00, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If she did, this would be an automatic keep. But she only played for a youth team, not for the national selection.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:02, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:19, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 11:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - tried searching for the references but didn't got any on which the article can be Kept, if anyone finds wp:rs on her I would concider changing my comment, but as of now its a Delete for me. Dtt1^Talk 16:39, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete. I found one reference to Bacon via a ProQuest database search of Australian newspapers and I don't that would qualify as WP:SIGCOV but have added it to the page just in case it helps. I would be inclined to delete the apge. Cabrils (talk) 02:05, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.