Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hangzhou Xiaoshan Sports Centre
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Tyrenius (talk) 05:19, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hangzhou Xiaoshan Sports Centre[edit]
- Hangzhou Xiaoshan Sports Centre (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non notable football stadium, which 'holds people'. Harland1 (t/c) 09:40, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nn sports stadium, also not linked in Wikipedia at all except for AFD. STORMTRACKER 94 12:27, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Probable keep. It's not an orphan anymore, and the page has been updated to add the home team. Are there precedents regarding sports venues? We have an awful lot of them (in lots of countries) that don't make a claim of notability greater than this. I'm not using WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, but rather asking if guidelines or common outcomes have been written. It seems to get some google hits in Chinese including some press coverage, so I think it probably meets the basic notability requirement. I would guess that that's usually true of facilities of this size, regardless of where they are, and that may be why we have so many. Rigadoun (talk) 22:44, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. If the team that it hosts meets the notability guidelines, then so does the stadium. Corvus cornixtalk 00:11, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Home pitch of a notable football club, seems to meet notability. matt91486 (talk) 03:00, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I've no idea why it was objected when I wrote halfway. Then I thought I will update later. So It's unnecessary to refute. TRUTH IS TRUTH. --Dj nix (talk) 03:28, 23 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.