Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Handmaids to Kitty Girls

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:38, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Handmaids to Kitty Girls[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per WP:GNG and WP:NEPISODE. Much of the episode is WP:FANCRUFT and is already covered at the parent season's page: RuPaul's Drag Race All Stars (season 3). It gets on average 11 views per page versus the 1500 the parent season gets. Clearly, readers get the info they need from the parent season page. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 18:41, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 18:41, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Strong keep, along with all of the other recent episode nominations by same editor. There's enough secondary coverage to justify keeping and expanding, and nominator should please stop tagging so many articles at once because this does not give editors enough time to help improve. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:43, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:48, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We do not create articles on the "expectation of notability" or "future notability when someone gets around to expanding it". The mainspace is not for drafts or partially complete articles. That's what sandboxes and the user space is for. We do not need articles for the sale of articles. Additionally, its not just about the lack of detail on the page, page views show it is unlikely that readers will find/come to the page. They're much more likely to find the information on the parent season's page as demonstrated by the page views. Its a weak keep at best if you're arguing for keep. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 18:48, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since we're now going to be having this discussion multiple times, here's how I replied over at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PharmaRusical: 'The main space is not for partially complete articles? Are you kidding? Wikipedia is full of incomplete articles. Nor do page views speak to notability. Next time try assessing secondary coverage WP:BEFORE nominating." ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Besides what's currently used on the page, there's coverage solely about the episode (versus mentions) on Culturess here; Gold Derby here; Vulture here with analysis regarding if the show's format is working; and NewNowNext here. --Kbabej (talk) 19:21, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.