Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hand of Vecna

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Vecna. (non-admin closure) Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 21:34, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hand of Vecna[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability is not established. TTN (talk) 21:20, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 21:20, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 21:20, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Vecna. It has, nearly word-for-word, the same text as the previous article on the Eye of Vecna except for brief differences in the "Powers" section. As the article on the Eye has already been merged to the main Vecna article, and that article already contains the information on the Hand, no action is needed other than a Redirect. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 21:51, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Vecna, unless some substantial third-party sources can be identified. Josh Milburn (talk) 23:13, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as I think the Tor link shows a start of notability, or merge to Vecna. BOZ (talk) 06:33, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Redirect - Tor link is better than nothing, but it's still just a passing mention. Grayfell (talk) 10:34, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as "start to notability" is not the same as notable. Longevitydude (talk) 02:37, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Vecna, no need at all for a separate article. Wachholder (talk) 18:06, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.