Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hananim

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The question of redirecting from this title is left to editorial discretion. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:47, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hananim[edit]

Hananim (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Replace with redirect to Haneullim. Page is essentially the same subject matter as Haneullim. There are apparently some differences (that I don't fully understand), but these can be more fully explained in the Haneullim article. Bazonka (talk) 06:58, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom, and because the article is partially & badly translated to the point it is essentially nonsense--Jac16888 Talk 21:15, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 03:36, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:33, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and restore redirect as this article is hardly acceptable and would need to be restarted. SwisterTwister talk 06:14, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete and redirect per nom and above editors. Onel5969 TT me 13:50, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.