Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HanaLena (Nash Street)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:02, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HanaLena (Nash Street)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Coverage is entirely local in nature. Found only trivial coverage under either name Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:11, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Local coverage and no major awards or releases. Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:16, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, local coverage and not much of it does not rise to significance. Pikavoom (talk) 08:49, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mississippi-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As stated by others, the group did get a little coverage in local entertainment papers ([1], [2]), but they do not qualify for an article here per WP:SIGCOV and WP:TOOSOON. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 17:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.