Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halabos na hipon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No prejudice towards a merge discussion or renomination. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:58, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Halabos na hipon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~essentially a one-sentence article that was thrown in without context and it is certainly no encyclopedic. UnrepentantTaco (talk) 18:58, 19 June 2013 (UTC)~~ [Edit reverted as per WP:BE and [1]. Unscintillating (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2013 (UTC)][reply]

Comment. The nomination addresses only the quality of the current article: that is not a reason for deletion. (Also, it's taken as read that the nominator supports deletion. Per WP:DISCUSSAFD, you shouldn't add a bolded !vote.) Dricherby (talk) 21:38, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tentative keep Weak nomination rationale apart (being a stub is no reason to delete; "unencyclopedic" is a known fallacy): it is cited a lot in cuisine books [2] -it can be presumed there are reasonable sources in the original (Filipino?) language about it. --Cyclopia^talk 13:04, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Actually, it's a criteria for speedy, "no assertion of notability". UnrepentantTaco (talk) 18:40, 20 June 2013 (UTC) [Edit reverted as per WP:BE and [3]. Unscintillating (talk) 13:38, 23 June 2013 (UTC)][reply]

WP:A7/WP:A8 (note, "No indication of importance") applies only to articles about individuals, animals, organizations, web content, event and musical recordings. In general, if you think an article matches one of the speedy deletion criteria, please speedy it instead of bringing it to AfD. Dricherby (talk) 19:44, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy close: The nominator was blocked as of 06:52, 21 June 2013 for sock puppetry per a discussion "Disruptive creation of groundless AFDs, probable sockpuppetry". Also nominator is voting inside nominations - removed. Crtew (talk) 16:37, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Shrimp (food). It doesn't appear to have received significant coverage in reliable sources, but it does exist: [4], [5], [6]. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:29, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.