Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hal elrod

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ‑Scottywong | talk _ 01:44, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hal elrod[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I guess being a bestselling author is a claim to notability, hence AfD not speedy. The claim is unsourced, & all I can see are unsatisfactory refs like the two provided in the article. TheLongTone (talk) 13:11, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 14:10, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 14:49, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The Miracle Morning easily passes WP:NBOOK - e.g. [1]. And it seems it has become a franchise of several other "Miracle Morning" titles (often written in conjunction with other writers) that receive coverage as well - e.g. [2]. Now - there is alot of crud out there in terms of sourcing (given the promotion of the multitude of books) - but it seems this passes WP:NAUTHOR and probably GNG as well - e.g. coverage [3]. Icewhiz (talk) 15:00, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:55, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep there does seem to be enough coverage of The Miracle Morning to have some article, either on the book or the author. As The Miracle Morning is a redlink, this should be kept. If an article is created, I'd support a redirect. power~enwiki (π, ν) 15:14, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.