Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hal Rockland (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:17, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hal Rockland[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A directory-like listing for an unremarkable performer. Awards / categories are not significant. Significant RS coverage not found. Does not meet WP:NACTOR / WP:PORNBIO.

First AfD closed as "Keep" in 2010, based on the arguments such as "the awards meet PORNBIO". However, PORNBIO has been significantly tightened since then, so it's a good time to revisit. For example, the awards listed no longer qualify under it. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:43, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:51, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:52, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for failing WP:PORNBIO. -The Gnome (talk) 10:53, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete If there is one group we have a disproprotionately large number of articles on it is pornographic actors. Sportspeople are another big problem, but pornographic actors are much more out of line with actual substantial and meaningful coverage of them.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:57, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not pass WP:GNG with no references except IMDb Atlantic306 (talk) 17:59, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as no evidence of notability, hasnt won any notable awards ,fails PORNBIO & GNG –Davey2010^Talk 14:41, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.