Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hakan Yildiz
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 17:09, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hakan Yildiz[edit]
- Hakan Yildiz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable actor lacking GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO and WP:ENT. ttonyb (talk) 22:50, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I just gave the article a cleanup. His career seems to be pushing at ENT (even if only in Turkey). Available sources (in Turkish) over a decade-long span appear to meet requirements of the GNG and need to be translated and added. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 04:25, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It's an unreferenced BLP, so that alone should be reason enough to delete it. And he doesn't look notable either: a few TV show appearances and some local play acting. No awards, no coverage in the media. Fails WP:ENT. Yilloslime TC 15:01, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The sources found on gnews don't seem to be about only this person, but rather about several other people. Without a translator (his name translates to "Stars" on gtrans) I would have a hard time accepting those articles as proof of notability. --Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) 14:28, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.