Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haji Idrees Palh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 01:33, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Haji Idrees Palh[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG No independent sources to be found, nor in Western script, nor in Sindhi script. The Banner talk 14:29, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:22, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:23, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:40, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:28, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Serving on a local union council in Pakistan is not an automatic WP:NPOL pass in and of itself — it could get him over criterion #2 if the depth of sourcing needed to pass WP:GNG were shown, but it does not get him an automatic inclusion freebie on no sourcing just because he existed. There's also a possible conflict of interest here, as both the creator and the most frequent followup editor have "Palh" in their usernames. Bearcat (talk) 17:19, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.