Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haitian Swiss

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. New sources were added to the article. (non-admin closure) —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 03:15, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Haitian Swiss[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Small community, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 12:11, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:34, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:34, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Haiti-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:34, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 July 25. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:38, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no significant coverage (only sources I can find just say X is Haitian Swiss) Danski454 (talk) 13:28, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The added sources demonstrate notability. Danski454 (talk) 13:25, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of the above; no evidence of WP:GNG Spiderone 14:24, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Topic doesn’t lack sources, the article does. “Small communities” do not effect WP:GNG. Are these small communities at all influential in some way? (Should be the focus; Roma communities for eg., even though coverage and populations are small). Significant coverage is more readily available in French-related sources (Switzerland is a small non-English speaking country), thus a redirect in one’s approach at research is needed. Will introduce these sources later on in the day. Savvyjack23 (talk) 18:11, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: In fact "Haitians in Switzerland" inevitably may be best suited for the naming of this article, rather than Haitian Swiss if these sources should prove one terminology over the other. TBD shortly in my follow-up. Cheers. Savvyjack23 (talk) 20:50, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:01, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Updated changes: @Störm, Spiderone, Danski454 I've included some additional content in favor of. After reviewing, if this article remains, I would definitely recommend a move to Haitians in Switzerland. The dual-faction identity is rather benign in the country in general, especially amongst smaller ethnic groups. Savvyjack23 (talk) 04:43, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The population being small doesn't impact notability.★Trekker (talk) 16:22, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The sources in the article are enough to prove notability. Zoozaz1 (talk) 23:03, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.