Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hain't

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge and redirect to ain't. Babajobu 20:18, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hain't[edit]

Dicdef at best. Article gives no indication that the word was ever widespread. Fishal 21:19, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

Merge with ain't.--Esprit15d 21:26, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to ain't. Apparently it's a semi-cromulent but nonstandard word. --Kinu 00:03, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to ain't. --Revolución (talk) 01:35, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect per above. Stifle 11:21, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect per above. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 15:07, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.