Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hader Clinic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. T. Canens (talk) 17:51, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hader Clinic[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG. The only reliable sources provide only incidental coverage of this place. Rogermx (talk) 23:23, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:55, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:56, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep I agree the existing references are not substantial. I have just added 2 decent references found via a search in ProQuest, including a 2016 ABC TV Four Corners program, which gave substantial (negative) coverage to the clinic, and I would think satisfy WP:NORG. The content of the page does not feel overly promotional to me (have see a lot worse) so I would be inclined to keep it. Cabrils (talk) 04:32, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:54, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Even if not strongly. There is a good scattering of non trivial mentions in good IRS other those already referred to here or in the article, sufficinent to add to the article somewhat. Aoziwe (talk) 13:53, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I see nothing notable about the subject. As it is this is an advertisement or promotion and that is not what Wikipedia is for. Lubbad85 (☎) 17:40, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:08, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.