Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hack Murphy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:58, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hack Murphy[edit]

Hack Murphy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not convinced that this is a notable enough person. Nothing of any significance found on news sources. Incidentally, I'm not able to directly contact the creator of the article, as he or she has been blocked indefinitely. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 21:54, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete Per WP:BIO. Cannot WP:INHERIT notability for collaborating with famous people. Outside of his collaborations there does't seem to be much independent reliable coverage of the subject. Comatmebro (talk) 22:40, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:19, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:19, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:19, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 00:05, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.