Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HSenid Outsourcing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mojo Hand (talk) 15:46, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HSenid Outsourcing[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

CSD contested by SPA. No indication that company meets WP:CORP Dewritech (talk) 17:58, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How can this meets the standards outlined. if so on which areas ? i belive this doesnt have any promotional stuff.Das Beyondm (talk) 18:26, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Redirect to HSenid Software International if that survives its own AfD. No evidence that this subsidiary is in tself notable. AllyD (talk) 21:15, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds too promotional. Delete. Alexius08 (talk) 22:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep . Nothing found as promotional . Keep this Royz78 (talk) 17:24, 16 January 2014 (UTC) — Royz78 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Why are there phrases like "Software Solutions", "supplying high quality software products" and "serving Enterprises of all sizes with their Mobile App needs"? Alexius08 (talk) 00:43, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:26, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alexius08, According to your comment , i have removed those promotional wordings from page . Kindly Please check .

Hi AllyD , You have mention that there are no evidence for this as subsidiary of hsenid software , but if you check following sites , there they clearly mention it . kindly please refer : http://hsenid.com/about-us/company-profile , and hsenid.com/business-areas , http://hsenidoutsourcing.com/about-us/company-profile

Please advice me . ThanksDas Beyondm (talk) 18:50, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No, I did not say that there is no evidence that this is a subsidiary of HSenid Software International: I accept that as fact. What I do dispute is whether this subsidiary is of encyclopaedic notability in its own right; of that no evidence is presented, nor can I locate any. AllyD (talk) 21:36, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.